Religious Naturalism or Theological Humanism?
Abstract. Loyal Rue's book Religion Is Not About God (2005) is a polemic for religious naturalism. In it Rue sets up a general model of religion based on principles of scientific materialism, tests his model against five historical religions, and speculates on the future of religion. He claims...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
Lenguaje: | Inglés |
Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publicado: |
Open Library of Humanities$s2024-
2007
|
En: |
Zygon
Año: 2007, Volumen: 42, Número: 2, Páginas: 357-368 |
Otras palabras clave: | B
theological humanism
B Scientific Materialism B Loyal Rue B religious naturalism |
Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1827959223 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20221220052618.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 221220s2007 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/j.1467-9744.2007.00357.x |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1827959223 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1827959223 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Klemm, David E. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Religious Naturalism or Theological Humanism? |
264 | 1 | |c 2007 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Abstract. Loyal Rue's book Religion Is Not About God (2005) is a polemic for religious naturalism. In it Rue sets up a general model of religion based on principles of scientific materialism, tests his model against five historical religions, and speculates on the future of religion. He claims that in the West, modern science and pluralism threaten the moral authority of Christianity in facing the environmental crisis, which is fueled by a rival metareligion, consumerism. He concludes that an ecological Doomsday is likely, following which a new religion will arise: religious naturalism. I challenge Rue's account at three levels, from the standpoint of theological humanism. First, as a philosopher of religion, Rue cannot carry through his scientific materialist explanation of religion. The first-person experience of consciousness escapes such an account. Second, as a myth maker, Rue unifies the evolutionary epic retrospectively, where the evidence is thin, and projects the future overconfidently. Third, as a theologian, Rue is wrong to equate God and Nature. | ||
601 | |a Theologe | ||
650 | 4 | |a theological humanism | |
650 | 4 | |a Scientific Materialism | |
650 | 4 | |a Loyal Rue | |
650 | 4 | |a religious naturalism | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Zygon |d [London] : Open Library of Humanities$s2024-, 1966 |g 42(2007), 2, Seite 357-368 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)300593570 |w (DE-600)1482903-4 |w (DE-576)090854799 |x 1467-9744 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:42 |g year:2007 |g number:2 |g pages:357-368 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2007.00357.x |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2007.00357.x |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4235364138 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1827959223 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20221220052618 | ||
LOK | |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#8E70D9275C5646530EED7B1FA126B8C4E7BDF7E9 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
OAS | |a 1 |b inherited from superior work | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |