Can Western Monotheism Avoid Substance Dualism?
The problem of divine agency and action is analogous to the problem of human agency and action: How is such agency possible in the absence of a dualistic causal interaction between disparate orders of being? This paper explores nondualistic accounts of divine agency that assert the following: (1) ph...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo | 
| Idioma: | Inglês | 
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway | 
| Journals Online & Print: | |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) | 
| Publicado em: | 
          
        2001
     | 
| Em: | 
      Zygon          
     Ano: 2001, Volume: 36, Número: 1, Páginas: 153-177  | 
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
        divineagency
     B principle ofexplanatory exclusion B downward causation B top-down causality B Nondualism B supervenience B Reductionism  | 
| Acesso em linha: | 
                  Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)                 Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)  | 
| Parallel Edition: | Não eletrônico
     | 
| Resumo: | The problem of divine agency and action is analogous to the problem of human agency and action: How is such agency possible in the absence of a dualistic causal interaction between disparate orders of being? This paper explores nondualistic accounts of divine agency that assert the following: (1) physical monism, (2) antireductionism, (3) physical realization, and (4) divine causal realism. I conclude that a robustly causal deity is incompatible with nonddualism's affirmation of physical monism. Specifically, I argue the incoherence of nondualistic strategies that advocate divine information transfer without energy transfer or the divine downward causation of physical events. Furthermore, I claim that the principle of explanatory exclusion makes any nondualistic, noninterventionist account of divine agency highly dubious. Finally, I suggest that Judaism, Christianity, and Islam can avoid a causally inert deity only if they are willing to deny the current presumption of the causal closure of the physical. | 
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1467-9744 | 
| Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Zygon
     | 
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI:  10.1111/0591-2385.00345 |