Relating Science and Theology with Complementarity: A Caution
Abstract. I examine Helmut Reich's recent (Zygon, December 1990) discussion of the complementarity model for relating science and theology and find it confusing. On the one hand, his complementarity purports to make science and theology relevant for each other. It even requires we solve their c...
Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
---|---|
Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Έκδοση: |
Wiley-Blackwell
1991
|
Στο/Στη: |
Zygon
Έτος: 1991, Τόμος: 26, Τεύχος: 2, Σελίδες: 309-315 |
Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
Helmut Reich
B theology and science B complementarity |
Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Παράλληλη έκδοση: | Μη ηλεκτρονικά
|
Σύνοψη: | Abstract. I examine Helmut Reich's recent (Zygon, December 1990) discussion of the complementarity model for relating science and theology and find it confusing. On the one hand, his complementarity purports to make science and theology relevant for each other. It even requires we solve their conflicts. On the other hand, it discourages the overlap of scientific and theological knowledge and thus the direct resolution of their conflicts. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1467-9744 |
Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: Zygon
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9744.1991.tb00818.x |