Is There Indeed a Coptic 2 Enoch?
In 2009, Joost Hagen made a remarkable discovery: he attributed four Coptic fragments from material excavated at Qasr Ibrim to 2 Enoch, since then most scholars no longer refer to this pseudepigraphon as “Slavonic Enoch”. Nevertheless, some works have appeared that question the authenticity of this...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publié: |
2022
|
| Dans: |
Scrinium
Année: 2022, Volume: 18, Numéro: 1, Pages: 440-451 |
| Classifications IxTheo: | HD Judaïsme ancien |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Slavonic Pseudepigrapha
B Coptic fragments of 2 Enoch B recensions B 2 Enoch |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | In 2009, Joost Hagen made a remarkable discovery: he attributed four Coptic fragments from material excavated at Qasr Ibrim to 2 Enoch, since then most scholars no longer refer to this pseudepigraphon as “Slavonic Enoch”. Nevertheless, some works have appeared that question the authenticity of this attribution, the article deals with the problem and provides arguments in favour of Hagen’s identification of the fragments. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1817-7565 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Scrinium
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/18177565-bja10072 |
