Routine (Non-Religious) Neonatal Circumcision and Bodily Integrity: A Transatlantic Dialogue

In the current debate about the pros and cons of routine (nonreligious) neonatal circumcision (RNC), the emphasis is on medical justifications for the practice. Questions of human rights also are widely discussed. However, even if the alleged medical benefits of RNC were to outweigh the harms and ri...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dekkers, Wim (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press 2009
In: Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal
Year: 2009, Volume: 19, Issue: 2, Pages: 125-146
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1826989617
003 DE-627
005 20221214052552.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221214s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1353/ken.0.0279  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1826989617 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1826989617 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Dekkers, Wim  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Routine (Non-Religious) Neonatal Circumcision and Bodily Integrity: A Transatlantic Dialogue 
264 1 |c 2009 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In the current debate about the pros and cons of routine (nonreligious) neonatal circumcision (RNC), the emphasis is on medical justifications for the practice. Questions of human rights also are widely discussed. However, even if the alleged medical benefits of RNC were to outweigh the harms and risks, this is not a sufficient justification for RNC. The practice of RNC is questionable from a variety of viewpoints including not only the ideal of evidence-based medicine and human rights considerations, but also the notion of respect for bodily integrity. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |a Kennedy Institute of Ethics  |t Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal  |d Baltimore, Md. : Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1991  |g 19(2009), 2, Seite 125-146  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320481840  |w (DE-600)2009887-X  |w (DE-576)266818668  |x 1086-3249  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:19  |g year:2009  |g number:2  |g pages:125-146 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.0.0279  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/1/article/268976  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 19  |j 2009  |e 2  |h 125-146 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4230900481 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1826989617 
LOK |0 005 20221214052552 
LOK |0 008 221214||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-05#21CBDB94D1C0DBED4A36C225830DD9FB3087E4CC 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw