A Defense of The-Risks-of-Daily-Life

, Research examining the safe and effective treatment of diseases and disorders affecting children offers one of the best prospects for improving the medical treatment of children. But the inclusion of children in research raises difficult ethical questions, among them: To how much risk is it permis...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Binik, Ariella (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press 2017
In: Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal
Year: 2017, Volume: 27, Issue: 3, Pages: 413-442
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1826987339
003 DE-627
005 20230428033645.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221214s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1353/ken.2017.0033  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1826987339 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1826987339 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Binik, Ariella  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 2 |a A Defense of The-Risks-of-Daily-Life 
264 1 |c 2017 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a , Research examining the safe and effective treatment of diseases and disorders affecting children offers one of the best prospects for improving the medical treatment of children. But the inclusion of children in research raises difficult ethical questions, among them: To how much risk is it permissible to expose children in research? Various thresholds have been proposed to constrain research risks that do not offer children the prospect of direct medical benefit. These proposals include limiting research risks to (1) the risks of routine medical examinations, (2) the risks of participation in charitable activities, (3) the risks of family life, and (4) the risks-of-daily-life. I examine which, if any, of these proposals is defensible. I argue that only the risks-of-daily-life threshold is defensible and I offer a new justification for this risk threshold. I argue that the risks of daily life are justifiable because they are part of a reasonable trade-off between personal safety and our ability to pursue meaningful lives. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |a Kennedy Institute of Ethics  |t Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal  |d Baltimore, Md. : Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1991  |g 27(2017), 3, Seite 413-442  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320481840  |w (DE-600)2009887-X  |w (DE-576)266818668  |x 1086-3249  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:27  |g year:2017  |g number:3  |g pages:413-442 
856 |u https://muse.jhu.edu/article/672172/pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via page says license)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.2017.0033  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/1/article/672172  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 27  |j 2017  |e 3  |h 413-442 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4230898207 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1826987339 
LOK |0 005 20221214052549 
LOK |0 008 221214||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-05#0A1478EE86EF579A25DE5E4F7010167E1BE880A2 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw