Epistemic Equality: Distributive Epistemic Justice in the Context of Justification
, ABSTRACT:, Social inequality may obstruct the generation of knowledge, as the rich and powerful may bring about social acceptance of skewed views that suit their interests. Epistemic equality in the context of justification is a means of preventing such obstruction. Drawing on social epistemology...
Authors: | ; |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
2022
|
In: |
Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal
Year: 2022, Volume: 32, Issue: 2, Pages: 173-203 |
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1826986626 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20221214052548.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 221214s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1353/ken.2022.0011 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1826986626 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1826986626 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Miller, Boaz |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Epistemic Equality: Distributive Epistemic Justice in the Context of Justification |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a , ABSTRACT:, Social inequality may obstruct the generation of knowledge, as the rich and powerful may bring about social acceptance of skewed views that suit their interests. Epistemic equality in the context of justification is a means of preventing such obstruction. Drawing on social epistemology and theories of equality and distributive justice, we provide an account of epistemic equality. We regard participation in, and influence over a knowledge-generating discourse in an epistemic community as a limited good that needs to be justly distributed among putative members of the community. We argue that rather than trying to operationally formulate an exact criterion for distributing this good, epistemic equality may be realized by insisting on active participation of members of three groups in addition to credited experts: relevant disempowered groups, relevant uncredited experts, and relevant stakeholders. Meeting these conditions fulfills the political, moral, and epistemic aims of epistemic equality. | ||
601 | |a Episteme | ||
601 | |a Distribution | ||
700 | 1 | |a Pinto, Meital |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |a Kennedy Institute of Ethics |t Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal |d Baltimore, Md. : Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1991 |g 32(2022), 2, Seite 173-203 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320481840 |w (DE-600)2009887-X |w (DE-576)266818668 |x 1086-3249 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:32 |g year:2022 |g number:2 |g pages:173-203 |
856 | |u https://philpapers.org/archive/MILEED-3.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.2022.0011 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/1/article/858852 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
936 | u | w | |d 32 |j 2022 |e 2 |h 173-203 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4230897499 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1826986626 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20221214052548 | ||
LOK | |0 008 221214||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-05#50D9334261BFF8F80649E20D125DE863E8052D60 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |