The Ethics of Lockdown: Communication, Consequences, and the Separateness of Persons
, ABSTRACT:, Are lockdown measures ethically justified? This paper outlines some of the key issues relevant to answering that question, paying particular attention to how decisions are framed. Section 1 argues that ethical reasoning about lockdown ought to be guided by a distinction between prudenti...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
2020
|
In: |
Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal
Year: 2020, Volume: 30, Issue: 3, Pages: 265-289 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1826985794 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20221214052547.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 221214s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1353/ken.2020.0015 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1826985794 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1826985794 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a John, Stephen |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Ethics of Lockdown: Communication, Consequences, and the Separateness of Persons |
264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a , ABSTRACT:, Are lockdown measures ethically justified? This paper outlines some of the key issues relevant to answering that question, paying particular attention to how decisions are framed. Section 1 argues that ethical reasoning about lockdown ought to be guided by a distinction between prudential and ethical reasons, grounded in a concern to respect the separateness of persons, but also that—as public health messaging implies—it can be unclear whether measures are in individuals’ prudential interests or not. Section 2 suggests that a similar set of problems affect attempts to adopt alternative cost-benefit-analysis frameworks for assessing lockdown. Section 3 suggests an answer to these shared problems: we need a process for determining when wellbeing claims and systems of categorization are ethically apt. Section 4 argues that settling the question of aptness is our key ethical task in assessing lockdown. | ||
601 | |a Lockdown | ||
601 | |a communicare | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |a Kennedy Institute of Ethics |t Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal |d Baltimore, Md. : Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1991 |g 30(2020), 3, Seite 265-289 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320481840 |w (DE-600)2009887-X |w (DE-576)266818668 |x 1086-3249 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:30 |g year:2020 |g number:3 |g pages:265-289 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.2020.0015 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/1/article/773105 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4230896662 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1826985794 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20221214052547 | ||
LOK | |0 008 221214||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-05#DBC148517CC41F4E150397FB5F47753B48E7D775 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |