Deliberative Democracy and Stem Cell Research in New York State: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
Many states in the U.S. have adopted policies regarding human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research in the last few years. Some have arrived at these policies through legislative debate, some by referendum, and some by executive order. New York has chosen a unique structure for addressing policy decis...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
2009
|
| In: |
Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal
Year: 2009, Volume: 19, Issue: 1, Pages: 63-78 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1826985069 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221214052546.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221214s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1353/ken.0.0274 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1826985069 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1826985069 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Sulmasy, Daniel P. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Deliberative Democracy and Stem Cell Research in New York State: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2009 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Many states in the U.S. have adopted policies regarding human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research in the last few years. Some have arrived at these policies through legislative debate, some by referendum, and some by executive order. New York has chosen a unique structure for addressing policy decisions regarding this morally controversial issue by creating the Empire State Stem Cell Board with two Committees—an Ethics Committee and a Funding Committee. This essay explores the pros and cons of various policy arrangements for making public policy decisions about morally controversial issues in bioethics (as well as other issues) through the lens of Deliberative Democracy, focusing on the principles of reciprocity, publicity, and accountability. Although New York's unique mechanism potentially offers an opportunity to make policy decisions regarding a morally controversial subject like hESC research in accord with the principles of Deliberative Democracy, this essay demonstrates its failure to do so in actual fact. A few relatively simple changes could make New York's program a real model for putting Deliberative Democracy into practice in making policy decisions regarding controversial bioethical issues. | ||
| 601 | |a New York, NY | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |a Kennedy Institute of Ethics |t Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal |d Baltimore, Md. : Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1991 |g 19(2009), 1, Seite 63-78 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320481840 |w (DE-600)2009887-X |w (DE-576)266818668 |x 1086-3249 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:19 |g year:2009 |g number:1 |g pages:63-78 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.0.0274 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/1/article/260010 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4230895933 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1826985069 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221214052546 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221214||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-05#36328A2ABC8506D86C9F46052EDBA15A00840927 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||