The Controversy over Retrospective Moral Judgment
, The mandate of the U.S. Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments required that the Committee take a position on the validity of retrospective moral judgments. However, throughout its period of operation, the Committee remained divided on the question of whether sound judgments of individu...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
1996
|
| In: |
Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal
Year: 1996, Volume: 6, Issue: 3, Pages: 245-250 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1826983317 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221214052543.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221214s1996 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1353/ken.1996.0023 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1826983317 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1826983317 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Buchanan, Allen E. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Controversy over Retrospective Moral Judgment |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1996 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a , The mandate of the U.S. Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments required that the Committee take a position on the validity of retrospective moral judgments. However, throughout its period of operation, the Committee remained divided on the question of whether sound judgments of individual culpability and wrongdoing should be included in its Final Report. This essay examines the arguments that various committee members marshalled to support their opposing views on retrospective moral judgment and explains the significance of the controversy. | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |a Kennedy Institute of Ethics |t Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal |d Baltimore, Md. : Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1991 |g 6(1996), 3, Seite 245-250 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320481840 |w (DE-600)2009887-X |w (DE-576)266818668 |x 1086-3249 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:6 |g year:1996 |g number:3 |g pages:245-250 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.1996.0023 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/1/article/18507 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 6 |j 1996 |e 3 |h 245-250 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 423089418X | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1826983317 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221214052543 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221214||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#A4E67C08381B628D9846252AECF72458CAC89512 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||