Inter-Philosophies Dialogue: Creating a Paradigm for Global Health Ethics

While debate remains about the definition and goals of work on global health, there is growing agreement that our moral starting point is the reality of unjust inequalities in the distribution of the conditions necessary for human health and well-being. With the growth of multi-jurisdictional and mu...

Полное описание

Сохранить в:  
Библиографические подробности
Главные авторы: Benatar, Solomon (Автор) ; Daibes, Ibrahim (Автор) ; Tomsons, Sandra (Автор)
Формат: Электронный ресурс Статья
Язык:Английский
Проверить наличие: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Опубликовано: 2016
В: Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal
Год: 2016, Том: 26, Выпуск: 3, Страницы: 323-346
Online-ссылка: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1826982604
003 DE-627
005 20221214052542.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221214s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1353/ken.2016.0027  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1826982604 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1826982604 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Benatar, Solomon  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Inter-Philosophies Dialogue: Creating a Paradigm for Global Health Ethics 
264 1 |c 2016 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a While debate remains about the definition and goals of work on global health, there is growing agreement that our moral starting point is the reality of unjust inequalities in the distribution of the conditions necessary for human health and well-being. With the growth of multi-jurisdictional and multicultural global health partnerships, the adequacy of the prevailing bioethical paradigm guiding the conduct of global health research and practice is being increasingly challenged. In response to ethical challenges and conflicts confronted by decision-makers in global health research and practice, we propose an innovative methodology that could be developed to bridge the gap between polarized systems of ideas and values (metaphysical, epistemological, moral, and political). Our inter-philosophies methodology provides the potential to construct a new, shared paradigm for global health ethics, thereby increasing the capacity for solidarity and shared decision-making in global health research and practice. 
601 |a Paradigma 
700 1 |a Daibes, Ibrahim  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Tomsons, Sandra  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |a Kennedy Institute of Ethics  |t Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal  |d Baltimore, Md. : Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1991  |g 26(2016), 3, Seite 323-346  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320481840  |w (DE-600)2009887-X  |w (DE-576)266818668  |x 1086-3249  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:26  |g year:2016  |g number:3  |g pages:323-346 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.2016.0027  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/1/article/635079  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4230893477 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1826982604 
LOK |0 005 20221214052542 
LOK |0 008 221214||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-05#C3CAE9B35C5448A7A2A7339D812F722BCBD3B453 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw