Tendencies in the synoptic resurrection tradition
Although many exegetes assume that the synoptic tradition was transmitted according to certain tendencies or laws of oral transmission, they do not spend much time verifying this assumption. This essay investigates the way in which tendencies are used by various scholars (Bultmann, Craig, Paulsen, a...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Gargar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado: |
NTWSA
1989
|
| En: |
Neotestamentica
Año: 1989, Volumen: 23, Número: 2, Páginas: 177-194 |
| Otras palabras clave: | B
Theology
B J.D B Crossan B New Testament Bible B Resurrection B W.L B Craig B Form Criticism B Paulsen B Bultmann B Christianity B Jesus Christ |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Sumario: | Although many exegetes assume that the synoptic tradition was transmitted according to certain tendencies or laws of oral transmission, they do not spend much time verifying this assumption. This essay investigates the way in which tendencies are used by various scholars (Bultmann, Craig, Paulsen, and Crossan) to establish the oldest or most reliable witness to the resurrection of Jesus Christ. It is concluded that an analysis of the resurrection traditions in terms of tendencies does not yield much in the way of positive results. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2518-4628 |
| Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: Neotestamentica
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.10520/AJA2548356_834 |