Measuring arguments from order for Q

The argument from order for the two-document hypothesis is central to the claim that Q is a unified document rather than a collection of shorter documents or shared oral tradition. Once double tradition material is extracted from Matthew and Luke and paired, the argument becomes essentially mathemat...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tripp, Jeffrey M. 1978- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2013
In: Neotestamentica
Year: 2013, Volume: 47, Issue: 1, Pages: 123-148
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1826580271
003 DE-627
005 20221214095307.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221208s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.10520/EJC141182  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1826580271 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1826580271 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1059723786  |0 (DE-627)798778261  |0 (DE-576)415780527  |4 aut  |a Tripp, Jeffrey M.  |d 1978- 
109 |a Tripp, Jeffrey M. 1978-  |a Tripp, Jeffrey Michael 1978- 
245 1 0 |a Measuring arguments from order for Q 
264 1 |c 2013 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The argument from order for the two-document hypothesis is central to the claim that Q is a unified document rather than a collection of shorter documents or shared oral tradition. Once double tradition material is extracted from Matthew and Luke and paired, the argument becomes essentially mathematical. Previous attempts at measuring the degree of agreement have rarely included detailed methodological discussions. Hence these measurements derive from loosely defined or implied methodologies influenced by subjective choices of the scholar, making it impossible to judge the relative probabilities of their results. This article proposes a new statistical metric borrowed from regression analysis, the coefficient of determination (R2). This metric is then applied to influential tables of double tradition material to determine the strength of their agreement. As will be demonstrated, these tables do not provide strong evidence of a unified document behind double tradition material based on order alone. 
601 |a Argumentation 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Neotestamentica  |d Pretoria : NTWSA, 1967  |g 47(2013), 1, Seite 123-148  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)369556437  |w (DE-600)2119512-2  |w (DE-576)410110930  |x 2518-4628  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:47  |g year:2013  |g number:1  |g pages:123-148 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/43048899  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.10520/EJC141182  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://journals.co.za/doi/abs/10.10520/EJC141182  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo  |a BIIN 
951 |a AR 
BIB |a 1 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4228401708 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1826580271 
LOK |0 005 20221208052756 
LOK |0 008 221208||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-30#61DFAA5655AFBA1916EA1BFB1F509BD69F6330EE 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/43048899 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
SUB |a BIB