More on models and muddles in the social-scientific interpretation of the New Testament

It is argued that the explicit use of social science models, even so-called cross-cuItural models, does not necessarily help to eliminate anachronistic and ethnocentric interpretations of New Testament texts. A historical approach (aim of interpretation) that does not assume commensurability between...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Craffert, P. F. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: NTWSA 1992
In: Neotestamentica
Year: 1992, Volume: 26, Issue: 1, Pages: 217-239
Further subjects:B Naturalist
B Ethnocentric
B Anti-necessitarian viewpoints
B Sociological fallacy
B Social theories
B Anachronistic interpretations
B Mediationism
B Fetishism
B Strict intentionism
B Parallelomania
B Explicit theory
B Functionalism
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1826580190
003 DE-627
005 20221214094741.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221208s1992 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.10520/AJA2548356_973  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1826580190 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1826580190 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Craffert, P. F.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a More on models and muddles in the social-scientific interpretation of the New Testament 
264 1 |c 1992 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a It is argued that the explicit use of social science models, even so-called cross-cuItural models, does not necessarily help to eliminate anachronistic and ethnocentric interpretations of New Testament texts. A historical approach (aim of interpretation) that does not assume commensurability between different cultures, which emphasises the native's point of view, has more potential in this respect. 
601 |a Interpretation 
601 |a Testament 
650 4 |a Strict intentionism 
650 4 |a Sociological fallacy 
650 4 |a Social theories 
650 4 |a Parallelomania 
650 4 |a Naturalist 
650 4 |a Mediationism 
650 4 |a Functionalism 
650 4 |a Fetishism 
650 4 |a Explicit theory 
650 4 |a Ethnocentric 
650 4 |a Anti-necessitarian viewpoints 
650 4 |a Anachronistic interpretations 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Neotestamentica  |d Pretoria : NTWSA, 1967  |g 26(1992), 1, Seite 217-239  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)369556437  |w (DE-600)2119512-2  |w (DE-576)410110930  |x 2518-4628  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:26  |g year:1992  |g number:1  |g pages:217-239 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/43048025  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.10520/AJA2548356_973  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://journals.co.za/doi/abs/10.10520/AJA2548356_973  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo  |a BIIN 
936 u w |d 26  |j 1992  |e 1  |h 217-239 
951 |a AR 
BIB |a 1 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4228401627 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1826580190 
LOK |0 005 20221208052756 
LOK |0 008 221208||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-30#2491E181CF032E0A1D2EE5E24EEB483351401D80 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/43048025 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
SUB |a BIB