Q and Galilee?

It is widely accepted in scholarship that the hypothetical sayings collection Q originated in the Jesus movement which persisted in Galilee after the ministry of Jesus of Nazareth. This study accepts the hypothesis of a source, common to Matthew and Luke, not merely written in Greek but also reflect...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Taylor, Nicholas (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: NTWSA 2003
In: Neotestamentica
Year: 2003, Volume: 37, Issue: 2, Pages: 283-311
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1826577254
003 DE-627
005 20221214095620.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221208s2003 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.10520/EJC83140  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1826577254 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1826577254 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1043600388  |0 (DE-627)770709117  |0 (DE-576)311349587  |4 aut  |a Taylor, Nicholas 
109 |a Taylor, Nicholas  |a Taylor, Nicholas H.  |a Taylor, N. H. 
245 1 0 |a Q and Galilee? 
264 1 |c 2003 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a It is widely accepted in scholarship that the hypothetical sayings collection Q originated in the Jesus movement which persisted in Galilee after the ministry of Jesus of Nazareth. This study accepts the hypothesis of a source, common to Matthew and Luke, not merely written in Greek but also reflecting a tradition of oral delivery in Greek. It accepts also that many of the traditions preserved therein originate in the historical ministry of Jesus, without identifying these with any earlier layer identified by previous scholarship. The Galilean provenance of Q is questioned, in the light of eight factors, which are considered in turn: (1) the nature and definition of Q, and its relationship to other Jesus traditions; (2) the language of Q; (3) scribal skills in rural Galilee; (4) the purpose in committing Q to writing; (5) geographical allusions in the reconstructed document; (6) the nature of itinerancy in the mission charge; (7) Israelite traditions and institutions; and (8) Q and primitive Christian kerygma. It is argued that Q was transcribed to facilitate wider and more efficient dissemination of the tradition of Jesus' teaching in the Greek language, and that the impetus and occasion for this would not have occurred in Galilee. The provenance of Q is therefore to be sought elsewhere. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Neotestamentica  |d Pretoria : NTWSA, 1967  |g 37(2003), 2, Seite 283-311  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)369556437  |w (DE-600)2119512-2  |w (DE-576)410110930  |x 2518-4628  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:37  |g year:2003  |g number:2  |g pages:283-311 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1644704145  |k Non-Electronic 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/43048482  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.10520/EJC83140  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://journals.co.za/doi/abs/10.10520/EJC83140  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo  |a BIIN 
951 |a AR 
BIB |a 1 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4228398685 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1826577254 
LOK |0 005 20221208052750 
LOK |0 008 221208||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-30#DC5CA3C35394FFE6507DBBA9523869C03C23BA03 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/43048482 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
SUB |a BIB