The beginning of the word to a theory of archaeological grammar

In this paper an outline of a theory of archaeological grammar is developed. The type of discourse this theory deals with is explained, as well as the relevance of the theory for a critique of both the positivist and deconstructionist models of text and discourse. Reference is made to the opening ph...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Visagie, P. J. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: NTWSA 1990
In: Neotestamentica
Year: 1990, Volume: 24, Issue: 1, Pages: 131-142
Further subjects:B Archaelogical grammar
B Theology
B Archaeology
B New Testament Bible
B Literary interpretation
B Interpretation criticism
B Christianity
B John 1:1-18
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1826577041
003 DE-627
005 20221214094855.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221208s1990 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.10520/AJA2548356_525  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1826577041 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1826577041 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Visagie, P. J.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The beginning of the word to a theory of archaeological grammar 
264 1 |c 1990 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In this paper an outline of a theory of archaeological grammar is developed. The type of discourse this theory deals with is explained, as well as the relevance of the theory for a critique of both the positivist and deconstructionist models of text and discourse. Reference is made to the opening phrases in the Prologue of the Gospel of John to illustrate some of the basic concepts of the theory. Examples such as the modern reverence for the human mind or for social justice are also dealt with in the analysis, to indicate how the principles of archaeological grammar underlie both the biblical and the modernist language of belief. Connecting links which this grammar may have with other theories, such as the study of rhetoric or speech act theory or conceptual semantics, are briefly pointed out. 
650 4 |a Literary interpretation 
650 4 |a Archaelogical grammar 
650 4 |a John 1:1-18 
650 4 |a New Testament Bible 
650 4 |a Interpretation criticism 
650 4 |a Archaeology 
650 4 |a Theology 
650 4 |a Christianity 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Neotestamentica  |d Pretoria : NTWSA, 1967  |g 24(1990), 1, Seite 131-142  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)369556437  |w (DE-600)2119512-2  |w (DE-576)410110930  |x 2518-4628  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:24  |g year:1990  |g number:1  |g pages:131-142 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/43047942  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.10520/AJA2548356_525  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://journals.co.za/doi/abs/10.10520/AJA2548356_525  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo  |a BIIN 
951 |a AR 
BIB |a 1 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4228398472 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1826577041 
LOK |0 005 20221208052750 
LOK |0 008 221208||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-30#BA75E52C7216E48BE82F8EBEF66AF2B6B4322F44 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/43047942 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
SUB |a BIB