The Love of God and the Radical Enlightenment: Mary Astell's Brush with Spinoza

, The essay argues that Mary Astell’s support of the theocentric philosophy of Nicolas Malebranche embroiled her in the fray of anti-Spinozism in the late seventeenth and early eighteenth century. Because of her dawning awareness of contemporaries’ associations of Malebranche’s occasionalism with th...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ellenzweig, Sarah (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: University of Pennsylvania Press 2003
In: Journal of the history of ideas
Year: 2003, Volume: 64, Issue: 3, Pages: 379-397
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 182655792X
003 DE-627
005 20231013161244.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221208s2003 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1353/jhi.2003.0037  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)182655792X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP182655792X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Ellenzweig, Sarah  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The Love of God and the Radical Enlightenment: Mary Astell's Brush with Spinoza 
264 1 |c 2003 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a , The essay argues that Mary Astell’s support of the theocentric philosophy of Nicolas Malebranche embroiled her in the fray of anti-Spinozism in the late seventeenth and early eighteenth century. Because of her dawning awareness of contemporaries’ associations of Malebranche’s occasionalism with the Spinozist doctrine of one substance, Astell retracted her previous endorsement of this theory in 1694. When contemporaries briefly turned the accusation of Spinozism against Locke and his followers in the early 1700s, however, Astell felt free to return to a support of Malebranche. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of the history of ideas  |d Philadelphia, Pa. : University of Pennsylvania Press, 1940  |g 64(2003), 3, Seite 379-397  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)300186193  |w (DE-600)1481685-4  |w (DE-576)09444921X  |x 1086-3222  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:64  |g year:2003  |g number:3  |g pages:379-397 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/3654232  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2003.0037  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/1/article/47659  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 64  |j 2003  |e 3  |h 379-397 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4228378595 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 182655792X 
LOK |0 005 20231013161244 
LOK |0 008 221208||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-01#786A044864BCD846A1334A3E238B6E951295BEB3 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/3654232 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL