Religion and Reason in American Politics
Whatever has been achieved in the recent debate regarding religion and politics in America, we have not yet clarified the proper place of religion in our public life. All parties endorse the terse formulation of the first amendment, "congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of re...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
1984
|
In: |
Journal of law and religion
Year: 1984, Volume: 2, Issue: 2, Pages: 325-342 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1826478663 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20221207172848.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 221207s1984 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.2307/1051094 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1826478663 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1826478663 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)170252019 |0 (DE-627)060312602 |0 (DE-576)16794620X |4 aut |a Gamwell, Franklin I. |d 1937- | |
109 | |a Gamwell, Franklin I. 1937- | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Religion and Reason in American Politics |
264 | 1 | |c 1984 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Whatever has been achieved in the recent debate regarding religion and politics in America, we have not yet clarified the proper place of religion in our public life. All parties endorse the terse formulation of the first amendment, "congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," but there is persisting disagreement about the public philosophy which is there implied. Some fear a secularized state, that is, a state which is independent of all religious convictions, and insist that disestablishment does not preclude a foundation of religious values in the Republic. Others fear a state that is religiously partial and insist that the "wall of separation" prescribes civil neutrality toward religion as such. Each side asserts that the other misrepresents its position. The "religionists," as I will call them, deny that they seek to impose any particular religious conviction; the "separationists," as I will call them, deny that they are hostile to religion. | ||
601 | |a Religion | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of law and religion |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1983 |g 2(1984), 2, Seite 325-342 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)461908581 |w (DE-600)2164472-X |w (DE-576)273875132 |x 2163-3088 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:2 |g year:1984 |g number:2 |g pages:325-342 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.2307/1051094 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-law-and-religion/article/religion-and-reason-in-american-politics/175B9C59A319493C08C5BEA41318A095 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4228141110 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1826478663 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20221207170556 | ||
LOK | |0 008 221207||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a rwrk | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |