Veinzen of verlangen?: Spel en geloof bij Johan Huizinga en Frans Kellendonk
Historian and linguist Johan Huizinga's theory of the function of play in human culture in Homo ludens (1938) includes a discussion of the close link between liturgy and play. In the 1980's author and cultural critic Frans Kellendonk put forward the notion of sincerelyfeigning ("oprec...
| Altri titoli: | "Themanummer homo ludens" |
|---|---|
| Autore principale: | |
| Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
| Lingua: | Olandese |
| Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Pubblicazione: |
University of Groningen Press
2022
|
| In: |
Theologia reformata
Anno: 2022, Volume: 65, Fascicolo: 4, Pagine: 354-370 |
| Notazioni IxTheo: | CH Cristianesimo e società KAJ Età contemporanea NAB Teologia fondamentale |
| Accesso online: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Riepilogo: | Historian and linguist Johan Huizinga's theory of the function of play in human culture in Homo ludens (1938) includes a discussion of the close link between liturgy and play. In the 1980's author and cultural critic Frans Kellendonk put forward the notion of sincerelyfeigning ("oprecht veinzen") in relation to faith in a post-Christian society. This article examines the socio-cultural background of Huizinga's and Kellendonk's ideas and their personal commitment to the faith. It concludes with a consideration of the question: Towhat extent can sincerely feigning be considered a sign of longing? |
|---|---|
| Comprende: | Enthalten in: Theologia reformata
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.21827/TR.65.4.354-370 |