Alternative Approaches to Applied Ethics: A Response to Carson’s Critique

Tom Carson’s recent paper on “Deception and Withholding Information in Sales” contains a critique of my contribution to sales ethics. In this response I outline the approach I develop in two earlier papers and address the four criticisms Carson makes. These criticisms are largely based on a misunder...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Holley, David M. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 2002
In: Business ethics quarterly
Year: 2002, Volume: 12, Issue: 1, Pages: 73-82
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1824201311
003 DE-627
005 20221202052658.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221202s2002 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2307/3857649  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1824201311 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1824201311 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Holley, David M.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Alternative Approaches to Applied Ethics: A Response to Carson’s Critique 
264 1 |c 2002 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Tom Carson’s recent paper on “Deception and Withholding Information in Sales” contains a critique of my contribution to sales ethics. In this response I outline the approach I develop in two earlier papers and address the four criticisms Carson makes. These criticisms are largely based on a misunderstanding of my position. I suggest that our fundamentally different approaches to applied ethics may lie at the root of Carson’s misunderstanding. Carson uses what I call a theory-application model in which the search for justification in terms of fundamental rules is central, while I attempt to contextualize ethical judgments and consider alternative ways of structuring social roles. In contrasting these approaches I raise the question of which way of doing applied ethics is likely to be more fruitful. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Business ethics quarterly  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1991  |g 12(2002), 1, Seite 73-82  |w (DE-627)341900230  |w (DE-600)2069764-8  |w (DE-576)273911066  |x 2153-3326  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:12  |g year:2002  |g number:1  |g pages:73-82 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/3857649  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2307/3857649  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/business-ethics-quarterly/article/abs/alternative-approaches-to-applied-ethics-a-response-to-carsons-critique/7983642AC1D7BEAD2BEF97E860B150F6  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 422301949X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1824201311 
LOK |0 005 20221202052658 
LOK |0 008 221202||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-29#FF645B0E29A2B8889BA0D389CA27AFD963859721 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/3857649 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw