Debunking Corporate Moral Responsibility
I address three topics. First, I argue that the issue of corporate moral responsibility is an important one for business ethics. Second, I examine a core argument for the claim that the corporate organization is a separate moral agent and show it is based on an unnoticed but elementary mistake deriv...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2003
|
| In: |
Business ethics quarterly
Year: 2003, Volume: 13, Issue: 4, Pages: 531-562 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 182420003X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221202052654.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221202s2003 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.5840/beq200313436 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)182420003X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP182420003X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Velasquez, Manuel |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Debunking Corporate Moral Responsibility |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2003 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a I address three topics. First, I argue that the issue of corporate moral responsibility is an important one for business ethics. Second, I examine a core argument for the claim that the corporate organization is a separate moral agent and show it is based on an unnoticed but elementary mistake deriving from the fallacy of division. Third, I examine the assumptions collectivists make about what it means to say that organizations act and that they act intentionally and show that these assumptions are mistaken in their failure to understand the nature of intentional causality and of “as-if” intentionality. In exposing these mistakes I set out my own view in the form of two theses, the first of which states that individual members of an organization are always causally responsible for any corporate act, and the second of which states that attributions of intentions to corporations are always either descriptive or prescriptive attributions of “as if” intentionality. | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Business ethics quarterly |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1991 |g 13(2003), 4, Seite 531-562 |w (DE-627)341900230 |w (DE-600)2069764-8 |w (DE-576)273911066 |x 2153-3326 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:13 |g year:2003 |g number:4 |g pages:531-562 |
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/3857970 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.5840/beq200313436 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/business-ethics-quarterly/article/abs/debunking-corporate-moral-responsibility/B4477BF8B5E691959A355781200BE7AF |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4223018213 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 182420003X | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221202052654 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221202||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-29#FB18CBEC534E7C0938D9EA4B5CDAFAA8FFE44214 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/3857970 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||