Principles of Managerial Moral Responsibility

The purpose of this paper is to formulate and defend a set of moral principles applicable to management. Our motivation is twofold: 1) to increase the coherence and utility of Integrative Social Contracts Theory (ISCT); and 2) to initiate an alternative stream of business ethics research. To those e...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Soule, Edward (Author) ; Hedahl, Marcus (Author) ; Dienhart, John (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 2009
In: Business ethics quarterly
Year: 2009, Volume: 19, Issue: 4, Pages: 529-552
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1824198752
003 DE-627
005 20221202052649.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221202s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.5840/beq200919431  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1824198752 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1824198752 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Soule, Edward  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Principles of Managerial Moral Responsibility 
264 1 |c 2009 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The purpose of this paper is to formulate and defend a set of moral principles applicable to management. Our motivation is twofold: 1) to increase the coherence and utility of Integrative Social Contracts Theory (ISCT); and 2) to initiate an alternative stream of business ethics research. To those ends, we specify what counts as adequate guidance in navigating the ethical terrain of business. In doing so, a key element of ISCT, Substantive Hypernorms, is found to be flawed beyond repair. So we propose and defend a remedy: prima facie moral principles. After delineating the appropriate criteria and format for such principles, we formulate, explain, and defend five of them. We conclude with a brief comment on future research possibilities. 
700 1 |a Hedahl, Marcus  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Dienhart, John  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Business ethics quarterly  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1991  |g 19(2009), 4, Seite 529-552  |w (DE-627)341900230  |w (DE-600)2069764-8  |w (DE-576)273911066  |x 2153-3326  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:19  |g year:2009  |g number:4  |g pages:529-552 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/27755310  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.5840/beq200919431  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/business-ethics-quarterly/article/abs/principles-of-managerial-moral-responsibility/67E6F9334F7BB3FB3DDBC9CE17EEBB8D  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4223016938 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1824198752 
LOK |0 005 20221202052649 
LOK |0 008 221202||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-29#A393C428F10A94A446ECA77EDE47FBA671D45868 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/27755310 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw