The Tide is Turning on the Separation Thesis?: A Response to Commentators

In my article “Understanding the Separation Thesis” I noted that most scholars in the business ethics field seemed to have accepted R. Edward Freeman’s argument to the effect that what he calls “the separation thesis” should be rejected. I argue, however, that they seemed to understand this thesis (...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sandberg, Joakim (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 2008
In: Business ethics quarterly
Year: 2008, Volume: 18, Issue: 4, Pages: 561-565
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1824198620
003 DE-627
005 20221202052649.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221202s2008 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.5840/beq200818440  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1824198620 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1824198620 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Sandberg, Joakim  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The Tide is Turning on the Separation Thesis?: A Response to Commentators 
264 1 |c 2008 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In my article “Understanding the Separation Thesis” I noted that most scholars in the business ethics field seemed to have accepted R. Edward Freeman’s argument to the effect that what he calls “the separation thesis” should be rejected. I argue, however, that they seemed to understand this thesis (and its rejection) in quite different ways. This volume contains three responses to my article which, interestingly enough, can be taken to corroborate my original argument. I here make some brief comments on these responses. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Business ethics quarterly  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1991  |g 18(2008), 4, Seite 561-565  |w (DE-627)341900230  |w (DE-600)2069764-8  |w (DE-576)273911066  |x 2153-3326  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:18  |g year:2008  |g number:4  |g pages:561-565 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/27673255  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.5840/beq200818440  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/business-ethics-quarterly/article/abs/tide-is-turning-on-the-separation-thesis-a-response-to-commentators/C9F4FAC23EC694B0C449C1A693253FDD  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4223016806 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1824198620 
LOK |0 005 20221202052649 
LOK |0 008 221202||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-29#7CD04A33E3CCC457916D2225A2AB38637A2600E5 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/27673255 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw