Conscience and its Counterfeits in Organizational Life: A New Interpretation of the Naturalistic Fallacy

This paper explains and defends three basic propositions: (1) that our attitudes (particularly American attitudes) toward organizational ethics are conflicted at a fairly deep level; (2) that in response to this conflict in our attitudes, we often default to various counterfeits of conscience (non-m...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Goodpaster, Kenneth E. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 2000
In: Business ethics quarterly
Year: 2000, Volume: 10, Issue: 1, Pages: 189-201
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1824197047
003 DE-627
005 20221202052644.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221202s2000 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2307/3857705  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1824197047 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1824197047 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Goodpaster, Kenneth E.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Goodpaster, Kenneth E.  |a Goodpaster, Kenneth  |a Goodpaster, Ken 
245 1 0 |a Conscience and its Counterfeits in Organizational Life: A New Interpretation of the Naturalistic Fallacy 
264 1 |c 2000 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This paper explains and defends three basic propositions: (1) that our attitudes (particularly American attitudes) toward organizational ethics are conflicted at a fairly deep level; (2) that in response to this conflict in our attitudes, we often default to various counterfeits of conscience (non-moral systems that serve as surrogates for the role of conscience in organizational settings); and (3) that a better response (than relying on counterfeits) would be for leaders to foster a culture of ethical awareness in their organizations. Some practical suggestions are made about fostering such a culture, and a comparison is made between this late-20th-century response to the problem of counterfeits and the classic “naturalistic fallacy” identified in early-20th-century ethics by G. E. Moore. 
601 |a conscience 
601 |a Interpretation 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Business ethics quarterly  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1991  |g 10(2000), 1, Seite 189-201  |w (DE-627)341900230  |w (DE-600)2069764-8  |w (DE-576)273911066  |x 2153-3326  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:10  |g year:2000  |g number:1  |g pages:189-201 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/3857705  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2307/3857705  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/business-ethics-quarterly/article/abs/conscience-and-its-counterfeits-in-organizational-life-a-new-interpretation-of-the-naturalistic-fallacy/B9DC7C1BE5D3F22CFF68DB4E4B89FEA3  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4223015222 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1824197047 
LOK |0 005 20221202052644 
LOK |0 008 221202||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-29#E19ADCA8C066B4119C5620A64954145763BCD459 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/3857705 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw