Introduction to the Special Section on Commercial Speech

In 1998, activist Marc Kasky sued Nike for alleged false advertising and unfair competition under California law. Kasky alleged that Nike made false statements in a variety of what we would usually consider non-advertising forums, including interviews and letters to the press. The Supreme Court of C...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Fort, Timothy L. (Author) ; Salbu, Steven R. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 2007
In: Business ethics quarterly
Year: 2007, Volume: 17, Issue: 1, Pages: 3-4
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1824196962
003 DE-627
005 20221202052644.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221202s2007 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.5840/beq200717117  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1824196962 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1824196962 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Fort, Timothy L.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Introduction to the Special Section on Commercial Speech 
264 1 |c 2007 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In 1998, activist Marc Kasky sued Nike for alleged false advertising and unfair competition under California law. Kasky alleged that Nike made false statements in a variety of what we would usually consider non-advertising forums, including interviews and letters to the press. The Supreme Court of California permitted Kasky's suit to go forward, even though the statements were not a part of traditional paid commercial advertisements. The Supreme Court of the United States, which initially granted certiorari to review the case, dismissed the writ on June 26, 2003, leaving intact California's broad interpretation of its statute and narrow construction of the Constitutional speech protections that constrain that statute. What is typically referred to as “the Nike case” or “the Kasky case” can mean either Kasky v. Nike (as the case was originally filed) or Nike v. Kasky (when Nike appealed the lower court's judgment). 
601 |a Special 
700 1 |a Salbu, Steven R.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Business ethics quarterly  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1991  |g 17(2007), 1, Seite 3-4  |w (DE-627)341900230  |w (DE-600)2069764-8  |w (DE-576)273911066  |x 2153-3326  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:17  |g year:2007  |g number:1  |g pages:3-4 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/27673155  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.5840/beq200717117  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/business-ethics-quarterly/article/abs/introduction-to-the-special-section-on-commercial-speech/85B8A32E7B94F6E289D5FB7FA50D8747  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4223015141 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1824196962 
LOK |0 005 20221202052644 
LOK |0 008 221202||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-29#7568CB757CFF5B3E1807CD17A458704AAB168AE3 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/27673155 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw