A Defense of Just Cause Dismissal Rules

The United States is distinctive among advanced economies in that its employment laws and practices are governed by Employment at Will (EAW). Most other nations have variations on Just Cause dismissal rules. I argue that the U.S. preference for EAW is unsupported by concerns about net social or econ...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: McCall, John J. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 2003
In: Business ethics quarterly
Year: 2003, Volume: 13, Issue: 2, Pages: 151-175
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1824194323
003 DE-627
005 20221202052633.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221202s2003 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.5840/beq200313211  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1824194323 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1824194323 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a McCall, John J.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 2 |a A Defense of Just Cause Dismissal Rules 
264 1 |c 2003 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The United States is distinctive among advanced economies in that its employment laws and practices are governed by Employment at Will (EAW). Most other nations have variations on Just Cause dismissal rules. I argue that the U.S. preference for EAW is unsupported by concerns about net social or economic consequences. More centrally, I argue that the basic moral commitments that underlie the U.S. system of private property and freedom of contract are commitments that lend support to Just Cause over EAW. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Business ethics quarterly  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1991  |g 13(2003), 2, Seite 151-175  |w (DE-627)341900230  |w (DE-600)2069764-8  |w (DE-576)273911066  |x 2153-3326  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:13  |g year:2003  |g number:2  |g pages:151-175 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/3857657  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.5840/beq200313211  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/business-ethics-quarterly/article/abs/defense-of-just-cause-dismissal-rules/3FF9EEACC57AA6458F8E4FAF1ECC2FC7  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4223012509 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1824194323 
LOK |0 005 20221202052633 
LOK |0 008 221202||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-29#AB3C67D6B8D2B1F5F9BD8E0D42B5604DD55DD655 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/3857657 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw