Psychological Pragmatism and the Imperative of Aims: A New Approach for business Ethics

Psychological forces in play across individual, group, and organizational levels of analysis increase the likelihood that people in business organizations will engage in misconduct. Therefore, it is argued, we must turn our attention from dominant normative and empirical trends in business ethics, w...

全面介紹

Saved in:  
書目詳細資料
主要作者: Margolis, Joshua D. (Author)
格式: 電子 Article
語言:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
出版: 1998
In: Business ethics quarterly
Year: 1998, 卷: 8, 發布: 3, Pages: 409-430
在線閱讀: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1824193742
003 DE-627
005 20221202052631.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221202s1998 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2307/3857429  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1824193742 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1824193742 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Margolis, Joshua D.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Psychological Pragmatism and the Imperative of Aims: A New Approach for business Ethics 
264 1 |c 1998 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Psychological forces in play across individual, group, and organizational levels of analysis increase the likelihood that people in business organizations will engage in misconduct. Therefore, it is argued, we must turn our attention from dominant normative and empirical trends in business ethics, which revolve around boundaries and constraints, and instead concentrate on methods for promoting ethical behavior in practice, exploiting psychological forces conducive to ethical conduct. This calls for a better understanding of how organizations and their inhabitants function, and, in turn, it points to pragmatic solutions. Ethical conduct can be promoted by (1) normatively justifying vivid aims worthy of pursuit alongside economic objectives, and (2) empirically identifying the conditions and practices that advance those aims in firms. This approach challenges us to bring empirical and normative inquiry together—in ways unsettling to both. It pushes us to move beyond an empirical preoccupation with decision making and judgment, and it requires us to cope with political liberalism’s legitimate qualms about discussions of the good. 
601 |a Psychologie 
601 |a Pragmatik 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Business ethics quarterly  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1991  |g 8(1998), 3, Seite 409-430  |w (DE-627)341900230  |w (DE-600)2069764-8  |w (DE-576)273911066  |x 2153-3326  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:8  |g year:1998  |g number:3  |g pages:409-430 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/3857429  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2307/3857429  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/business-ethics-quarterly/article/abs/psychological-pragmatism-and-the-imperative-of-aims-a-new-approach-for-business-ethics/4A81575251157EDEC9737929C6312A42  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4223011928 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1824193742 
LOK |0 005 20221202052631 
LOK |0 008 221202||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-29#070BE84EBDB1EB4DDD3E51F653F6EDC85DB72C74 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/3857429 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw