Decent Termination: A Moral Case for Severance Pay

People are often involuntarily laid off from their jobs through no fault of their own. Employees who are dismissed in this manner cannot always legitimately hold employers accountable for these miserable situations because the decision to implement layoffs is often the best possible outcome given th...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kim, Tae Wan (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 2014
In: Business ethics quarterly
Year: 2014, Volume: 24, Issue: 2, Pages: 203-227
Further subjects:B layoff
B Humiliation
B necessary evils
B severance pay
B expressive theory
B agent-regret
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1824193335
003 DE-627
005 20221202052629.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221202s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.5840/beq20145278  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1824193335 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1824193335 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Kim, Tae Wan  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Decent Termination: A Moral Case for Severance Pay 
264 1 |c 2014 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a People are often involuntarily laid off from their jobs through no fault of their own. Employees who are dismissed in this manner cannot always legitimately hold employers accountable for these miserable situations because the decision to implement layoffs is often the best possible outcome given the context—that is, layoffs in and of themselves may be “necessary evils.” Yet, even in circumstances in which layoffs qualify as “necessary evils,” morality demands that employers respect the dignity of those whose employment is involuntarily terminated. In this paper I argue that to preserve the dignity of employees who are involuntarily terminated, in most cases employers have a substantial reason to offer a special kind of unemployment benefit, “severance pay.” To support my claim I draw and expand upon Bernard Williams’s analysis of “agent-regret,” which I believe greatly helps to address and articulate employers’ obligations in the context of involuntary termination. 
650 4 |a expressive theory 
650 4 |a Humiliation 
650 4 |a necessary evils 
650 4 |a agent-regret 
650 4 |a layoff 
650 4 |a severance pay 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Business ethics quarterly  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1991  |g 24(2014), 2, Seite 203-227  |w (DE-627)341900230  |w (DE-600)2069764-8  |w (DE-576)273911066  |x 2153-3326  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:24  |g year:2014  |g number:2  |g pages:203-227 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/43695000  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20145278  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/business-ethics-quarterly/article/decent-termination-a-moral-case-for-severance-pay/5221009B6F907F542152F23866347CE5  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 24  |j 2014  |e 2  |h 203-227 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4223011510 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1824193335 
LOK |0 005 20221202052629 
LOK |0 008 221202||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-29#656679411D7189EDE9F0274327C63CE311187BF2 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/43695000 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw