The Political Perspective of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Critical Research Agenda

I here advance a critical research agenda for the political perspective of corporate social responsibility (Political CSR). I argue that whilst the ‘Political’ CSR literature is notable for both its conceptual novelty and practical importance, its development has been hamstrung by four ambiguities,...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Whelan, Glen (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publié: 2012
Dans: Business ethics quarterly
Année: 2012, Volume: 22, Numéro: 4, Pages: 709-737
Sujets non-standardisés:B Political corporate social responsibility
B Globalization
B Habermas
B Multinational Corporations
B Rawls
B Gouvernement d'entreprise
Accès en ligne: Accès probablement gratuit
Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Résumé:I here advance a critical research agenda for the political perspective of corporate social responsibility (Political CSR). I argue that whilst the ‘Political’ CSR literature is notable for both its conceptual novelty and practical importance, its development has been hamstrung by four ambiguities, conflations and/or oversights. More positively, I argue that ‘Political’ CSR should be conceived as one potential form of globalization, and not as a consequence of ‘globalization’; that contemporary Western MNCs should be presumed to engage in CSR for instrumental reasons; that ‘Political’ CSR should be associated with a corresponding ‘political’ model of corporate governance; and that both a ‘Rawlsian’ and ‘Habermasian’ perspective of Political CSR are different from ‘Political’ CSR. In concluding, I use these four critiques to identify a number of areas within which increasingly robust and sophisticated positive and normative theories of Political CSR are required.
ISSN:2153-3326
Contient:Enthalten in: Business ethics quarterly
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.5840/beq201222445