Social Categories and Business Ethics
In this article, I want to draw attention to one strand of the complex web of processes that are involved when people group others, including themselves, into social categories. I will focus on the tendency to treat members of one’s own group more favorably than nonmembers, a tendency that has been...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
1998
|
| In: |
Business ethics quarterly
Year: 1998, Volume: 8, Pages: 149-172 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1824189923 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221202052618.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221202s1998 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S1052150X00400126 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1824189923 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1824189923 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Messick, David M. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Social Categories and Business Ethics |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1998 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In this article, I want to draw attention to one strand of the complex web of processes that are involved when people group others, including themselves, into social categories. I will focus on the tendency to treat members of one’s own group more favorably than nonmembers, a tendency that has been called ingroup favoritism. The structure of the article has three parts. First I will offer an evolutionary argument as to why ingroup favoritism, or something very much like it, is required by theories of the evolution of altruism. I will then review some of the basic social psychological research findings dealing with social categorization generally, and ingroup favoritism specifically. Finally, I will examine two problems in business ethics from the point of view of ingroup favoritism to suggest ways in which social psychological principles and findings may be mobilized to help solve problems of racial or gender discrimination in business contexts. | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Business ethics quarterly |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1991 |g 8(1998), Seite 149-172 |w (DE-627)341900230 |w (DE-600)2069764-8 |w (DE-576)273911066 |x 2153-3326 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:8 |g year:1998 |g pages:149-172 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S1052150X00400126 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/business-ethics-quarterly/article/abs/social-categories-and-business-ethics/EA6C9AB587D8B011216E2F010A907434 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4223008102 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1824189923 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221202052618 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221202||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-29#F1F9E4FB7BF7D94333D7858147D39A13CECF6358 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||