Formkritik und Leserrezeption. Ein Beitrag zur Methodendiskussion am Beispiel Mk 9,14-29
The growing discussion about the methodological connections between a synchronic oriented Form-analysis and a diachronic type of Form criticism has in no way resulted in concerns lying behind both methodological approaches being resolved. On the contrary, the crisis of the classical methodological a...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | German |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Peeters
2001
|
| In: |
Biblica
Year: 2001, Volume: 82, Issue: 4, Pages: 496-514 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
| Summary: | The growing discussion about the methodological connections between a synchronic oriented Form-analysis and a diachronic type of Form criticism has in no way resulted in concerns lying behind both methodological approaches being resolved. On the contrary, the crisis of the classical methodological approaches can also open up a perspective on connections that have up to now been insufficiently considered. The present study attempts to demonstrate with the example of Mark 9,14-29 what methodological conclusions result for the question of reader reception from the Form-analysis of a narrative text. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2385-2062 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Biblica
|