Comments on Religious Freedom
Here, at the very beginning of our conference, it may be useful for me to restate summarily some of the main themes in The Meaning of Religious Freedom as I understand them. Professor Gamwell begins with what he calls "the modern political problematic." Regarded from a religious point of v...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
1995
|
| In: |
Journal of law and religion
Year: 1995, Volume: 12, Issue: 2, Pages: 583-588 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1823268404 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221123120908.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221123s1995 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.2307/1051598 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1823268404 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1823268404 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)174105703 |0 (DE-627)698999428 |0 (DE-576)163320640 |4 aut |a Tinder, Glenn E. |d 1923- | |
| 109 | |a Tinder, Glenn E. 1923- |a Tinder, Glenn 1923- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comments on Religious Freedom |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1995 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Here, at the very beginning of our conference, it may be useful for me to restate summarily some of the main themes in The Meaning of Religious Freedom as I understand them. Professor Gamwell begins with what he calls "the modern political problematic." Regarded from a religious point of view, the problematic is how a religious person (who, in accordance with the author's definition of religion as an answer to "the comprehensive question," might be a systematic atheist) can logically avoid either denying the political relevance of his faith and spurning public debate; or else entering into public debate, but insisting without argument on the truth of that faith and in that way seeking, at least implicitly, its official establishment. Regarded from a political point of view, the problematic is: how can religious people, with their nonrational faiths, be admitted into the political realm—a realm open to all regardless of diverse faiths and therefore necessarily based on the rational powers we all have in common—without fatally compromising the principled openness of public life? It is a crucial premise of Professor Gamwell's argument that a mere modus vivendi cannot be an adequate answer to this problematic; only a theory of justice will suffice. | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of law and religion |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1983 |g 12(1995), 2, Seite 583-588 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)461908581 |w (DE-600)2164472-X |w (DE-576)273875132 |x 2163-3088 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:12 |g year:1995 |g number:2 |g pages:583-588 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.2307/1051598 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-law-and-religion/article/comments-on-religious-freedom/897C5DC0F126922E2C4D21ED14408CC1 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4218634165 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1823268404 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221123115714 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221123||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a rwrk | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||