Otherness-based Reasons for the Protection of (Bio)Diversity

Different arguments in favor of the moral relevance of the concept of biodiversity (e.g., in terms of its intrinsic or instrumental value) face a range of serious difficulties, despite that biodiversity constitutes a central tenet of many environmentalist practices and beliefs. That discrepancy is c...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Subtitles:Otherness-based Reasons for the Protection of Biodiversity
Otherness-based Reasons for the Protection of Diversity
Authors: Wienhues, Anna ca. 20./21. Jh. (Author) ; Deplazes-Zemp, Anna (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Center for Environmental Philosophy, University of North Texas 2022
In: Environmental ethics
Year: 2022, Volume: 44, Issue: 2, Pages: 161-184
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:Different arguments in favor of the moral relevance of the concept of biodiversity (e.g., in terms of its intrinsic or instrumental value) face a range of serious difficulties, despite that biodiversity constitutes a central tenet of many environmentalist practices and beliefs. That discrepancy is considerable for the debate on potential moral reasons for protecting biodiversity. This paper adds a new angle by focusing on the potential of the concept of natural otherness - specifically individual and process otherness in nature - for providing additional moral reasons in favor of the protection of biodiversity as variety. Four arguments are presented. Two arguments draw on the individual natural otherness of nonhuman living beings and two additional arguments draw on the process otherness of active nature. The upshot is that each of these arguments - if successful - provides a moral reason in favor of the protection of biodiversity.
ISSN:2153-7895
Contains:Enthalten in: Environmental ethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.5840/enviroethics202271341