Strong Sustainability Ethics
This article explains how strong sustainability ethics has emerged and developed as a new field over the last two decades as a critical response to influential conceptions of weak sustainability. It investigates three competing, normative approaches to strong sustainability: the communitarian approa...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Center for Environmental Philosophy, University of North Texas
2021
|
| In: |
Environmental ethics
Year: 2021, Volume: 43, Issue: 4, Pages: 291-314 |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1822478294 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230306171320.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221115s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.5840/enviroethics202211332 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1822478294 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1822478294 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Bourban, Michel |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Strong Sustainability Ethics |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This article explains how strong sustainability ethics has emerged and developed as a new field over the last two decades as a critical response to influential conceptions of weak sustainability. It investigates three competing, normative approaches to strong sustainability: the communitarian approach, the Rawlsian approach, and the capabilities approach. Although these approaches converge around the idea that there are critical, non-substitutable natural resources and services, they diverge on how to reconcile human development and environmental protection. The aim of the paper is to provide a critical overview of these three perspectives, but also and mostly to show that when we put them into dialogue with each other, we can clarify the demands of sustainability. The paper concludes that the capabilities approach is the most suitable way to think about sustainability, but only if it goes beyond its dominantly anthropocentric view. | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Environmental ethics |d Denton, Tex. : Center for Environmental Philosophy, University of North Texas, 1979 |g 43(2021), 4, Seite 291-314 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)341349410 |w (DE-600)2067662-1 |w (DE-576)459254057 |x 2153-7895 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:43 |g year:2021 |g number:4 |g pages:291-314 |
| 856 | |u https://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/164851/7/WRAP-Strong-sustainability-ethics-Bourban-2021.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH doi match)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics202211332 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.pdcnet.org/pdc/bvdb.nsf/purchase?openform&fp=enviroethics&id=enviroethics_2021_0043_0004_0291_0314 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 936 | u | w | |d 43 |j 2021 |e 4 |h 291-314 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4211116169 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1822478294 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20230306171320 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x HK | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a tiep | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||