What is Cognition?: Peter Auriol's Account

My paper aims at presenting Peter Auriol’s theory of cognition. Auriol holds that cognition is 'something which makes an object appear to someone'. This claim, for Auriol, is meant to be indeterminate, as he explicitly says that the 'something' in question can refer to any type o...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Taieb, Hamid (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Peeters 2018
In: Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales
Year: 2018, Volume: 85, Issue: 1, Pages: 109-134
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1822443164
003 DE-627
005 20221115052824.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221115s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2143/RTPM.85.1.3284827  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1822443164 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1822443164 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Taieb, Hamid  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Taieb, Hamid 
245 1 0 |a What is Cognition?: Peter Auriol's Account 
264 1 |c 2018 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a My paper aims at presenting Peter Auriol’s theory of cognition. Auriol holds that cognition is 'something which makes an object appear to someone'. This claim, for Auriol, is meant to be indeterminate, as he explicitly says that the 'something' in question can refer to any type of being. However, when he states how cognition is 'implemented' in cognizers, Auriol specifies what this 'something' is: for God, it is simply the deity itself; for creatures, cognition is described as something 'absolute', i.e. non-relational, more precisely a complex entity made up of a cognitive power and a 'likeness'. However, one also finds Auriol saying that created cognition, as a 'likeness', is relative. Yet, when Auriol talks of created cognition as something relative, he does not make an ontological claim: he means that one cannot think of cognition without thinking of it as having a relation to an object. In brief, created cognition, for Auriol, is ontologically absolute, but it is always represented together with a relation.\n4207 \n4207 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales  |d Leuven : Peeters, 1997  |g 85(2018), 1, Seite 109-134  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)387427848  |w (DE-600)2145018-3  |w (DE-576)112775624  |x 1783-1717  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:85  |g year:2018  |g number:1  |g pages:109-134 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n elektronische Ausgabe  |w (DE-627)1797668196  |k Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2143/RTPM.85.1.3284827  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://poj.peeters-leuven.be/content.php?url=article&id=3284827&journal_code=RTPM  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 85  |j 2018  |e 1  |h 109-134 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4211086596 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1822443164 
LOK |0 005 20221115052824 
LOK |0 008 221115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-10-27#E8E37A7C67BDFF1108F02C391B6908497251716D 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw