John Duns Scotus in Two Minds about the Powers of the Soul

Over the centuries Scotus has been presented as holding that the powers of the soul are really the same but formally distinct. Yet, when expressly dealing with the issue, Scotus gives two accounts: the first asserts absolute identity between the soul and its powers and among the powers themselves; t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Van Den Bercken, John H.L. (Verfasst von)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: 2015
In: Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales
Jahr: 2015, Band: 82, Heft: 2, Seiten: 199-240
Online-Zugang: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallele Ausgabe:Nicht-Elektronisch

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1822442699
003 DE-627
005 20221115052823.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221115s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2143/RTPM.82.2.3129652  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1822442699 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1822442699 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Van Den Bercken, John H.L.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a John Duns Scotus in Two Minds about the Powers of the Soul 
264 1 |c 2015 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Over the centuries Scotus has been presented as holding that the powers of the soul are really the same but formally distinct. Yet, when expressly dealing with the issue, Scotus gives two accounts: the first asserts absolute identity between the soul and its powers and among the powers themselves; the second argues that the soul and its powers are really identical but formally distinct. So we may ask: why did Scotus offer two accounts, how are they related, and why did the second become dominant in historical surveys? In this paper I address these questions by considering the two accounts in the context of the views of Scotus’s immediate predecessors and of scattered remarks found in Scotus’s own writings. I argue, first, that Scotus throughout his career always endorsed the real identity of the powers of the soul as expressed in his first account, and, secondly, that the second account does not overrule the first but merely adds a qualification to the latter by way of concession to the authorities and the views of his Franciscan predecessors. The reason why Scotus became identified exclusively with his second account may well be the way this position was elaborated and presented by his associate William of Alnwick.\n4207 \n4207 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales  |d Leuven : Peeters, 1997  |g 82(2015), 2, Seite 199-240  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)387427848  |w (DE-600)2145018-3  |w (DE-576)112775624  |x 1783-1717  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:82  |g year:2015  |g number:2  |g pages:199-240 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1801143420  |k Non-Electronic 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/26486056  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2143/RTPM.82.2.3129652  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://poj.peeters-leuven.be/content.php?url=article&id=3129652&journal_code=RTPM  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 421108612X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1822442699 
LOK |0 005 20221115052823 
LOK |0 008 221115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-10-27#0DB8AE30851061BD247667A1E8583C84075B5FD5 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/26486056 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw