Henry of Harclay's Prologue to his Sentences Commentary, Question 1: Theology as a Science
This article offers the editio princeps of the first question of the Prologue of the Sentences commentary of Henry of Harclay (†1317), a secular theologian lecturing at Paris in the first decade of the fourteenth century. Traditionally, in his Sentences commentary Harclay has been seen as a follower...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | Latin |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Peeters
2011
|
| In: |
Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales
Year: 2011, Volume: 78, Issue: 1, Pages: 97-159 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | This article offers the editio princeps of the first question of the Prologue of the Sentences commentary of Henry of Harclay (†1317), a secular theologian lecturing at Paris in the first decade of the fourteenth century. Traditionally, in his Sentences commentary Harclay has been seen as a follower of John Duns Scotus, while in his Ordinary Questions written in the next decade while chancellor of Oxford Harclay is thought to be more independent from the Subtle Doctor. An analysis of the crucial question edited here, on whether theology is a science, shows that Harclay could be termed an independent Scotist in his early work.\n4207 \n4207 |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1783-1717 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.2143/RTPM.78.1.2125162 |