Students, Masters, and 'Heterodox' Doctrines at the Parisian Faculty of Arts in the 1270s
A few years ago, Malcolm de Mowbray argued that nearly everything that had been written concerning the origins of the condemnation issued on March 7, 1277 by the bishop of Paris, Stephen Tempier, was based on the unproven assumption that what motivated the condemnation were provocative doctrines tau...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Peeters
2009
|
| In: |
Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales
Year: 2009, Volume: 76, Issue: 1, Pages: 75-109 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 182244165X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221115052820.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221115s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.2143/RTPM.76.1.2037161 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)182244165X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP182244165X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Bianchi, Luca |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Bianchi, Luca | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Students, Masters, and 'Heterodox' Doctrines at the Parisian Faculty of Arts in the 1270s |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2009 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a A few years ago, Malcolm de Mowbray argued that nearly everything that had been written concerning the origins of the condemnation issued on March 7, 1277 by the bishop of Paris, Stephen Tempier, was based on the unproven assumption that what motivated the condemnation were provocative doctrines taught by university (especially Arts) masters; in contrast, de Mowbray maintained that the sources of the prohibited views were not the Arts masters, but students who uttered them in the course of «their disputations». The present article discusses the historiographical and methodological background of de Mowbray’s interpretation, provides evidence of the involvement of full-fledged masters in the dissemination of the prohibited doctrines, and examines the meaning of some controversial expressions and passages found in Tempier’s prefatory letter (specifically: studentes in artibus, quasi dubitabiles in scolis tractare et disputare presumunt, ut eis nesciant respondere).\n4207 \n4207 | ||
| 601 | |a Student | ||
| 601 | |a doctrina | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales |d Leuven : Peeters, 1997 |g 76(2009), 1, Seite 75-109 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)387427848 |w (DE-600)2145018-3 |w (DE-576)112775624 |x 1783-1717 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:76 |g year:2009 |g number:1 |g pages:75-109 |
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/26172324 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.2143/RTPM.76.1.2037161 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://poj.peeters-leuven.be/content.php?url=article&id=2037161&journal_code=RTPM |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4211085085 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 182244165X | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221115052820 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-10-27#ACB8629238AA10620B1380C9CAA66946E84055BC | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/26172324 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||