The Works of Richard Rufus of Cornwall: The State of the Question in 2009

The preponderance of the evidence indicates that Richard Rufus wrote the commentary on Aristotle’s Physics I published in 2003 as well as two commentaries on the Metaphysics. Rufus’ Aristotle commentaries date from the 1230’s as is clear from his own and Roger Bacon’s references. Twice in an undispu...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wood, Rega (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Peeters 2009
In: Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales
Year: 2009, Volume: 76, Issue: 1, Pages: 1-73
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1822441641
003 DE-627
005 20221115052820.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221115s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2143/RTPM.76.1.2037160  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1822441641 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1822441641 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Wood, Rega  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The Works of Richard Rufus of Cornwall: The State of the Question in 2009 
264 1 |c 2009 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The preponderance of the evidence indicates that Richard Rufus wrote the commentary on Aristotle’s Physics I published in 2003 as well as two commentaries on the Metaphysics. Rufus’ Aristotle commentaries date from the 1230’s as is clear from his own and Roger Bacon’s references. Twice in an undisputed Metaphysics commentary Rufus cites the distinctive and unchanging views about instantaneous change he stated «in Physicis» or «super librum Physicorum». Of course, some of his other opinions changed. In the course of claiming that these changes do not militate against the attribution, this article addresses the general question: What are the appropriate standards for an attribution?\n4207 \n4207 
601 |a Richard 
601 |a Cornwall 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales  |d Leuven : Peeters, 1997  |g 76(2009), 1, Seite 1-73  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)387427848  |w (DE-600)2145018-3  |w (DE-576)112775624  |x 1783-1717  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:76  |g year:2009  |g number:1  |g pages:1-73 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n elektronische Ausgabe  |w (DE-627)1646492307  |k Electronic 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/26172323  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2143/RTPM.76.1.2037160  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://poj.peeters-leuven.be/content.php?url=article&id=2037160&journal_code=RTPM  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4211085077 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1822441641 
LOK |0 005 20221115052820 
LOK |0 008 221115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-10-27#B8970610D4A476082DC65A8A221083E1AAF5C35A 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/26172323 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL