WHAT ABOUT ISAAC?: Rereading Fear and Trembling and Rethinking Kierkegaardian Ethics
In this essay I offer a reading of Fear and Trembling that responds to critiques of Kierkegaardian ethics as being, as Brand Blanshard claims, “morally nihilistic,” as Emmanuel Levinas contends, ethically violent, and, as Alasdair MacIntyre charges, simply irrational. I argue that by focusing on Isa...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2007
|
In: |
Journal of religious ethics
Year: 2007, Volume: 35, Issue: 2, Pages: 319-345 |
Further subjects: | B
ordeal
B Singularity B Ethics B Kierkegaard B Levinas B Hegel |
Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1822386063 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20221115052626.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 221115s2007 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/j.1467-9795.2007.00308.x |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1822386063 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1822386063 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Simmons, J. Aaron |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a WHAT ABOUT ISAAC?: Rereading Fear and Trembling and Rethinking Kierkegaardian Ethics |
264 | 1 | |c 2007 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a In this essay I offer a reading of Fear and Trembling that responds to critiques of Kierkegaardian ethics as being, as Brand Blanshard claims, “morally nihilistic,” as Emmanuel Levinas contends, ethically violent, and, as Alasdair MacIntyre charges, simply irrational. I argue that by focusing on Isaac's singularity as the very condition for Abraham's “ordeal,” the book presents a story about responsible subjectivity. Rather than standing in competition with the relation to God, the relation to other people is, thus, inscribed into this very relation. Fear and Trembling, I contend, advocates a bidirectional responsibility that is constitutive of subjectivity itself and, as such, actually resonates with certain aspects of Levinasian ethics. I conclude by suggesting that Abraham's ordeal is not due to the conflict between a nonreligious duty and the duty to God, but instead reflects a tension that is internal to the life of faith itself. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Levinas | |
650 | 4 | |a Hegel | |
650 | 4 | |a ordeal | |
650 | 4 | |a Singularity | |
650 | 4 | |a Ethics | |
650 | 4 | |a Kierkegaard | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of religious ethics |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1973 |g 35(2007), 2, Seite 319-345 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320450171 |w (DE-600)2005952-8 |w (DE-576)090888812 |x 1467-9795 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:35 |g year:2007 |g number:2 |g pages:319-345 |
856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40014871 |x JSTOR | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9795.2007.00308.x |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9795.2007.00308.x |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
936 | u | w | |d 35 |j 2007 |e 2 |h 319-345 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4211029444 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1822386063 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20221115052626 | ||
LOK | |0 008 221115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-03#B199BB1A95AD3797A76B71FE451AD51DA54F9667 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40014871 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |