FRAMES OF COMPARISON Anthropology and Inheriting Traditional Practices
This essay seeks to develop and illustrate an approach to comparison based on ad hoc frames. A frame is defined by a question, to which different thinkers can be seen as offering complementary and/or competing responses. Pursuing a middle ground between universalist conceptions of comparison and par...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2005
|
In: |
Journal of religious ethics
Year: 2005, Volume: 33, Issue: 2, Pages: 225-253 |
Further subjects: | B
Habit
B Hegel B Anthropology B Self B Xunzi B comparative ethics |
Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1822385342 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20221115052625.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 221115s2005 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/j.1467-9795.2005.00191.x |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1822385342 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1822385342 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Lewis, Thomas A. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a FRAMES OF COMPARISON Anthropology and Inheriting Traditional Practices |
264 | 1 | |c 2005 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a This essay seeks to develop and illustrate an approach to comparison based on ad hoc frames. A frame is defined by a question, to which different thinkers can be seen as offering complementary and/or competing responses. Pursuing a middle ground between universalist conceptions of comparison and particularist rejections of comparison, this approach brings various positions into dialogue in a manner that is not inherently totalizing. The article draws extensively on Hegel's philosophy of religion to articulate this approach to comparison and its presuppositions. The second section of the essay seeks to illustrate the value of this approach by using the question of how traditional practices are inherited to frame a comparison of Hegel on habit and the Confucian thinker Xunzi on ritual. This comparison functions principally to indicate the process of comparison and suggest the value of pursuing this comparison in greater depth. | ||
601 | |a Anthropologie | ||
650 | 4 | |a Xunzi | |
650 | 4 | |a Self | |
650 | 4 | |a Hegel | |
650 | 4 | |a Habit | |
650 | 4 | |a comparative ethics | |
650 | 4 | |a Anthropology | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of religious ethics |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1973 |g 33(2005), 2, Seite 225-253 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320450171 |w (DE-600)2005952-8 |w (DE-576)090888812 |x 1467-9795 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:33 |g year:2005 |g number:2 |g pages:225-253 |
856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40015306 |x JSTOR | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9795.2005.00191.x |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9795.2005.00191.x |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4211028723 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1822385342 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20221115052625 | ||
LOK | |0 008 221115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-03#45E4E9FCA1ADAC2E1487DF63B436B86311E32C55 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40015306 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |