FRAMES OF COMPARISON Anthropology and Inheriting Traditional Practices

This essay seeks to develop and illustrate an approach to comparison based on ad hoc frames. A frame is defined by a question, to which different thinkers can be seen as offering complementary and/or competing responses. Pursuing a middle ground between universalist conceptions of comparison and par...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lewis, Thomas A. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2005
In: Journal of religious ethics
Year: 2005, Volume: 33, Issue: 2, Pages: 225-253
Further subjects:B Habit
B Hegel
B Anthropology
B Self
B Xunzi
B comparative ethics
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1822385342
003 DE-627
005 20221115052625.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221115s2005 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/j.1467-9795.2005.00191.x  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1822385342 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1822385342 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Lewis, Thomas A.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a FRAMES OF COMPARISON Anthropology and Inheriting Traditional Practices 
264 1 |c 2005 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This essay seeks to develop and illustrate an approach to comparison based on ad hoc frames. A frame is defined by a question, to which different thinkers can be seen as offering complementary and/or competing responses. Pursuing a middle ground between universalist conceptions of comparison and particularist rejections of comparison, this approach brings various positions into dialogue in a manner that is not inherently totalizing. The article draws extensively on Hegel's philosophy of religion to articulate this approach to comparison and its presuppositions. The second section of the essay seeks to illustrate the value of this approach by using the question of how traditional practices are inherited to frame a comparison of Hegel on habit and the Confucian thinker Xunzi on ritual. This comparison functions principally to indicate the process of comparison and suggest the value of pursuing this comparison in greater depth. 
601 |a Anthropologie 
650 4 |a Xunzi 
650 4 |a Self 
650 4 |a Hegel 
650 4 |a Habit 
650 4 |a comparative ethics 
650 4 |a Anthropology 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of religious ethics  |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1973  |g 33(2005), 2, Seite 225-253  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320450171  |w (DE-600)2005952-8  |w (DE-576)090888812  |x 1467-9795  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:33  |g year:2005  |g number:2  |g pages:225-253 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40015306  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9795.2005.00191.x  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9795.2005.00191.x  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4211028723 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1822385342 
LOK |0 005 20221115052625 
LOK |0 008 221115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-03#45E4E9FCA1ADAC2E1487DF63B436B86311E32C55 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40015306 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL