Prospects for a Metaethical Argument for Theism: A Response to Stephen J. Sullivan

Disagreements about the success of any given argument often arise because the suppositions of the critic differ from the suppositions of the author of the argument. In maintaining the plausibility of a metaethical argument for theism against the objections articulated by Stephen J. Sullivan, I will...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Adams, Robert Merrihew (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 1993
In: Journal of religious ethics
Year: 1993, Volume: 21, Issue: 2, Pages: 313-318
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1822382440
003 DE-627
005 20221115052620.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221115s1993 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1822382440 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1822382440 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Adams, Robert Merrihew  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Prospects for a Metaethical Argument for Theism: A Response to Stephen J. Sullivan 
264 1 |c 1993 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Disagreements about the success of any given argument often arise because the suppositions of the critic differ from the suppositions of the author of the argument. In maintaining the plausibility of a metaethical argument for theism against the objections articulated by Stephen J. Sullivan, I will probe our differing suppositions with regard to the relation of theological to naturalistic metaethical theories, the starting point for the metaethical argument for theism, and the relation of the qualities of God's will to our obligation to obey God. 
601 |a Metaethik 
601 |a Argumentation 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of religious ethics  |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1973  |g 21(1993), 2, Seite 313-318  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320450171  |w (DE-600)2005952-8  |w (DE-576)090888812  |x 1467-9795  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:21  |g year:1993  |g number:2  |g pages:313-318 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1534662383  |k Non-Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/40015173  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4211025821 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1822382440 
LOK |0 005 20221115052620 
LOK |0 008 221115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-10-04#ECD6A25E29C466823E9854EE04EC110BCC8DEED0 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL