Textkritischer Kommentar zu ausgewählten Stellen des Matthäusevangeliums
In a contaminated manuscript tradition there is no such thing as a 'good' manuscript or a 'good' group of manuscripts. The right reading may be found anywhere in this tradition, even in the smallest parts. There is no other means of deciding between different readings than the to...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
[publisher not identified]
2009
|
In: |
Filología neotestamentaria
Year: 2009, Volume: 22, Pages: 55-90 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
Summary: | In a contaminated manuscript tradition there is no such thing as a 'good' manuscript or a 'good' group of manuscripts. The right reading may be found anywhere in this tradition, even in the smallest parts. There is no other means of deciding between different readings than the tools of philology, and every variant of the text must be considered as a unique case. This will be demonstrated in 33 variants of the text of Matthew's Gospel. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0214-2996 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Filología neotestamentaria
|