Ghazzālī’s Alteration of ḥadīths: Processes and Meaning*
Abstract This article starts from the hypothesis, tacitly made by traditional Muslim scholars, that Ghazzālī tended to alter Ḥadīth texts when using them in his Revival of the Religious Sciences. It goes on to explore this hypothesis in four cases previously identified by the author, and attributes...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2012
|
| In: |
Oriens
Year: 2012, Volume: 40, Issue: 1, Pages: 133-148 |
| Further subjects: | B
Ḥadīth, Alteration, Argument
B Ghazzālī B Zabīdī |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1821437039 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221116162948.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221110s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/187783712X634689 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1821437039 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1821437039 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Leites, Adrien |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Ghazzālī’s Alteration of ḥadīths: Processes and Meaning* |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2012 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract This article starts from the hypothesis, tacitly made by traditional Muslim scholars, that Ghazzālī tended to alter Ḥadīth texts when using them in his Revival of the Religious Sciences. It goes on to explore this hypothesis in four cases previously identified by the author, and attributes each case to a distinct process of alteration. These processes are shown to be triggered by specific concerns — doctrinal as well as argumentative. The article concludes that Ghazzālī departed from the Sunnī principle of authority, and gave priority to argument. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Zabīdī | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ḥadīth, Alteration, Argument | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ghazzālī | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Zabīdī | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ḥadīth, Alteration, Argument | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ghazzālī | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Oriens |d Leiden [u.a.] : Brill, 1948 |g 40(2012), 1, Seite 133-148 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)504272314 |w (DE-600)2213264-8 |w (DE-576)251711080 |x 1877-8372 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:40 |g year:2012 |g number:1 |g pages:133-148 |
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/42636410 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1163/187783712X634689 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://brill.com/view/journals/orie/40/1/article-p133_4.xml |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 40 |j 2012 |e 1 |h 133-148 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 420824108X | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1821437039 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221116162948 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-02#C379B4C38000FF9E94BDC40D0319C71A963E3ACD | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/42636410 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||