The local problem of God’s hiddenness: a critique of van Inwagen’s criterion of philosophical success

In regards to the problem of evil, van Inwagen thinks there are two arguments from evil which require different defenses. These are the global argument from evil—that there exists evil in general, and the local argument from evil—that there exists some particular atrocious evil X. However, van Inwag...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Soerensen, Jennifer L. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2013
In: International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2013, Volume: 74, Issue: 3, Pages: 297-314
Further subjects:B Criterion of philosophical success
B Divine Hiddenness
B van Inwagen
B Self-deception
B Local argument
B problem of evil
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1821423127
003 DE-627
005 20221110052746.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221110s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s11153-013-9420-7  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1821423127 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1821423127 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Soerensen, Jennifer L.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Soerensen, Jennifer L.  |a Soerensen, Jennifer 
245 1 4 |a The local problem of God’s hiddenness: a critique of van Inwagen’s criterion of philosophical success 
264 1 |c 2013 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In regards to the problem of evil, van Inwagen thinks there are two arguments from evil which require different defenses. These are the global argument from evil—that there exists evil in general, and the local argument from evil—that there exists some particular atrocious evil X. However, van Inwagen fails to consider whether the problem of God’s hiddenness also has a “local” version: whether there is in fact a “local” argument from God’s hiddenness which would be undefeated by his general defense of God’s hiddenness. This paper will argue that van Inwagen’s present account contains no implicit response to the “local” argument from God’s hiddenness, and, worse, the “local” argument brings to the fore crucial inconsistencies in van Inwagen’s account. These inconsistencies concern van Inwagen’s criterion for philosophical success—his methodological use of an “ideal audience” in an ideal debate—and a crucial premise in his argument: namely, that people who do not believe in God are culpably deceiving themselves regarding the manifest presence of God. These considerations will be a platform for my arguing that the failures of van Inwagen’s account amount to his ignoring the extra-rational, concrete aspect of grasping “spiritual propositions”—propositions which, in order to be affirmed, require the full self-understanding which precipitates out of the mind, body, and will of a particular existing individual. 
601 |a Problem 
601 |a Philosophie 
650 4 |a Self-deception 
650 4 |a Criterion of philosophical success 
650 4 |a Local argument 
650 4 |a problem of evil 
650 4 |a Divine Hiddenness 
650 4 |a van Inwagen 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal for philosophy of religion  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1970  |g 74(2013), 3, Seite 297-314  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320442098  |w (DE-600)2005049-5  |w (DE-576)103746927  |x 1572-8684  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:74  |g year:2013  |g number:3  |g pages:297-314 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/24709232  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-013-9420-7  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 74  |j 2013  |e 3  |h 297-314 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4208227133 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1821423127 
LOK |0 005 20221110052746 
LOK |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#1770CEFB349FDAB478C8013CB4DA87A538393788 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/24709232 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL