Blurred vision: Marion on the ‘possibility’ of revelation
In this paper I challenge Merold Westphal’s claim that Jean-Luc Marion’s hermeneutical phenomenology is especially useful for theology. I argue that in spite of his explicit allegiance to Husserl’s “principle of all principles,” Marion fails to embody a commitment to phenomenological seeing in his a...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
2010
|
In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2010, Volume: 67, Issue: 3, Pages: 157-171 |
Further subjects: | B
Husserl
B Theology B Phenomenology B Heidegger B Transcendence B Marion |
Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1821422708 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20221110052745.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 221110s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11153-010-9226-9 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1821422708 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1821422708 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Burch, Matthew I. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Blurred vision: Marion on the ‘possibility’ of revelation |
264 | 1 | |c 2010 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a In this paper I challenge Merold Westphal’s claim that Jean-Luc Marion’s hermeneutical phenomenology is especially useful for theology. I argue that in spite of his explicit allegiance to Husserl’s “principle of all principles,” Marion fails to embody a commitment to phenomenological seeing in his analyses of revelation. In the sections of Being Given where he discusses revelation, Marion allows faith-based claims to bleed into his phenomenological analyses, resulting in what I call his ‘blurred vision’—the pretension that phenomenological seeing can be extended to theological matters. This pretension undermines Marion’s phenomenological aspirations, because it invests his analyses with a theological content that phenomenological intuition cannot account for or clarify. At the same time, this blurring of the line between theology and phenomenology also makes Marion’s work theologically ineffective. For it furnishes the theologian and believer with the false assurance that faith-based commitments can be grounded in phenomenological knowledge—a claim that he simply cannot make good on. In light of these problems, I propose an alternative Heideggerian approach that maintains the boundary between philosophical and theological discourse and thereby safeguards the integrity of both. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Heidegger | |
650 | 4 | |a Transcendence | |
650 | 4 | |a Marion | |
650 | 4 | |a Husserl | |
650 | 4 | |a Theology | |
650 | 4 | |a Phenomenology | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for philosophy of religion |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1970 |g 67(2010), 3, Seite 157-171 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320442098 |w (DE-600)2005049-5 |w (DE-576)103746927 |x 1572-8684 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:67 |g year:2010 |g number:3 |g pages:157-171 |
856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40981198 |x JSTOR | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-010-9226-9 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
936 | u | w | |d 67 |j 2010 |e 3 |h 157-171 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4208226714 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1821422708 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20221110052745 | ||
LOK | |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#306EA4A807C5FDBFF9AA12C298936208402D43B5 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40981198 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |