Illusion and offense in Philosophical Fragments: Kierkegaard’s inversion of Feuerbach’s critique of Christianity

The article shows the “Appendix” to Søren Kierkegaard’s Philosophical Fragments to be a response to Ludwig Feuerbach’s critique of Christianity. While previous studies have detected some influence by Feuerbach on Kierkegaard, they have so far discovered little in the way of specific responses to Feu...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Malesic, Jonathan 1975- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2007
In: International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2007, Volume: 62, Issue: 1, Pages: 43-55
Further subjects:B Paradox
B Feuerbach
B Kierkegaard
B Illusion
B Alienation
B Offense
B Projection theory of religion
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1821418530
003 DE-627
005 20221111223557.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221110s2007 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s11153-007-9127-8  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1821418530 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1821418530 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)101546887X  |0 (DE-627)705391094  |0 (DE-576)348787618  |4 aut  |a Malesic, Jonathan  |d 1975- 
109 |a Malesic, Jonathan 1975- 
245 1 0 |a Illusion and offense in Philosophical Fragments: Kierkegaard’s inversion of Feuerbach’s critique of Christianity 
264 1 |c 2007 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The article shows the “Appendix” to Søren Kierkegaard’s Philosophical Fragments to be a response to Ludwig Feuerbach’s critique of Christianity. While previous studies have detected some influence by Feuerbach on Kierkegaard, they have so far discovered little in the way of specific responses to Feuerbach’s ideas in Kierkegaard’s published works. The article first makes the historical argument that Kierkegaard was very likely reading Feuerbach’s Essence of Christianity while he was writing Philosophical Fragments, as several of Kierkegaard’s journal entries from that period discuss Feuerbach in relation to central ideas in Fragments. The article then shows how Kierkegaard’s pseudonym Johannes Climacus inverts Feuerbach’s projection theory, turning it against critics like Feuerbach. At the heart of Feuerbach’s critique of Christianity is the claim that religion is a conceptual illusion, whereby the individual projects his or her personal limits onto the species and then projects the unlimited onto a supposed divine being. Furthermore, Feuerbach sees Christianity as rife with absurdities that tell against its reasonableness. In exploring a hypothetical transcendent avenue toward the truth, Climacus inverts both of these philosophical moves. He argues that on the transcendent hypothesis, the immanentist critic is himself a victim of an “acoustical illusion”: the absolute paradox of the appearance of the god in time is in fact not judged by, but rather judges, the critic as absurd. In inverting and not repudiating Feuerbach’s critique, Climacus reveals the critic as a Socratic figure who displays the heights—and ultimately, the limits—of secular philosophy’s capabilities. 
601 |a Philosophie 
601 |a Fragment 
601 |a Feuerbach 
650 4 |a Projection theory of religion 
650 4 |a Paradox 
650 4 |a Offense 
650 4 |a Kierkegaard 
650 4 |a Illusion 
650 4 |a Feuerbach 
650 4 |a Alienation 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal for philosophy of religion  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1970  |g 62(2007), 1, Seite 43-55  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320442098  |w (DE-600)2005049-5  |w (DE-576)103746927  |x 1572-8684  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:62  |g year:2007  |g number:1  |g pages:43-55 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/27646223  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-007-9127-8  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 62  |j 2007  |e 1  |h 43-55 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4208222549 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1821418530 
LOK |0 005 20221110052732 
LOK |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#DD5FF7D093E80137D342136E12BDBD9EDDCDABAB 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/27646223 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REF |a Religionstheorie 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Illusion,Illusion,Delusion,Hallucinations and illusions in literature 
STB 0 0 |a Illusion,Illusion,Illusion (art) 
STC 0 0 |a Ilusión,Ilusión 
STD 0 0 |a Illusione,Illusione 
STE 0 0 |a 幻觉,幻觉,妄想,妄想 
STF 0 0 |a 幻覺,幻覺,妄想,妄想 
STG 0 0 |a Ilusão,Ilusão 
STH 0 0 |a Иллюзия (мотив),Иллюзия 
STI 0 0 |a Ψευδαίσθηση <μοτίβο>,Ψευδαίσθηση,Αυταπάτη,Αυταπάτη (μοτίβο) 
SUB |a REL