The anxious believer: Macaulay’s prescient theodicy

Recent feminists have critiqued G.W. Leibniz’s Theodicy for its effort to justify God’s role in undeserved human suffering over natural and moral evil. These critiques suggest that theodicies which focus on evil as suffering alone obfuscate how to thematize evil, and so they conclude that theodicies...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hernandez, Jill Graper (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Nature B. V 2013
In: International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2013, Volume: 73, Issue: 3, Pages: 175-187
Further subjects:B philosophy of religion
B Feminism
B divine perfection
B Leibniz
B Evil
B Theodicy
B Civil Rights
B Early modern philosophy
B problem of evil
B Moral Evil
B God
B Catherine Macaulay
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1821417712
003 DE-627
005 20221110052729.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221110s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s11153-012-9365-2  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1821417712 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1821417712 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Hernandez, Jill Graper  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The anxious believer: Macaulay’s prescient theodicy 
264 1 |c 2013 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Recent feminists have critiqued G.W. Leibniz’s Theodicy for its effort to justify God’s role in undeserved human suffering over natural and moral evil. These critiques suggest that theodicies which focus on evil as suffering alone obfuscate how to thematize evil, and so they conclude that theodicies should be rejected and replaced with a secularized notion of evil that is inextricably tied to the experiences of the victim. This paper argues that the political philosophy found in the writings of Catherine Macaulay (1731–1791) can serve as a support to Leibniz’s larger claims and can also offer a more concrete, situated notion of evil that escapes the contemporary feminist critique. Macaulay’s work on natural and moral political evil, especially, will be presented as an early modern precursor to feminism, which defends divine perfection and a pre-established harmony in the face of political evil. I then identify three unique theodicical arguments in Macaulay’s work: the pragmatically beneficial defense, the eschatalogical defense, and the redemptive defense. 
650 4 |a philosophy of religion 
650 4 |a Early modern philosophy 
650 4 |a Civil Rights 
650 4 |a Feminism 
650 4 |a Catherine Macaulay 
650 4 |a Leibniz 
650 4 |a God 
650 4 |a Moral Evil 
650 4 |a Evil 
650 4 |a divine perfection 
650 4 |a Theodicy 
650 4 |a problem of evil 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal for philosophy of religion  |d Dordrecht : Springer Nature B.V, 1970  |g 73(2013), 3, Seite 175-187  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320442098  |w (DE-600)2005049-5  |w (DE-576)103746927  |x 1572-8684  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:73  |g year:2013  |g number:3  |g pages:175-187 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/24709286  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-012-9365-2  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4208221720 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1821417712 
LOK |0 005 20221110052729 
LOK |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#C24D33CCB124C3FB7E9380376E5C084EB4701D59 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/24709286 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL