Religious disagreements and epistemic rationality
Richard Feldman has argued that in cases of religious disagreement between epistemic peers who have shared all relevant evidence, epistemic rationality requires suspense of judgment. I argue that Feldman’s postulation of completely shared evidence is unrealistic for the kinds of disputes he is consi...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
2013
|
| In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2013, Volume: 74, Issue: 1, Pages: 33-48 |
| Further subjects: | B
Evidentialism
B Epistemic rationality B Religious disagreements B Shared evidence B Feldman B Epistemic peers B Suspense of judgment |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1821417623 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221110052729.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221110s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11153-012-9366-1 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1821417623 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1821417623 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Holley, David M. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Religious disagreements and epistemic rationality |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2013 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Richard Feldman has argued that in cases of religious disagreement between epistemic peers who have shared all relevant evidence, epistemic rationality requires suspense of judgment. I argue that Feldman’s postulation of completely shared evidence is unrealistic for the kinds of disputes he is considering, since different starting points will typically produce different assessments of what the evidence is and how it should be weighed. Feldman argues that there cannot be equally reasonable starting points, but his extension of the postulate of completely shared evidence to evidence for starting points involves an illicit assimilation of ordinary cases of evidence assessment to cases in which substantial agreement about background assumptions is lacking. I also clarify why even if Feldman were correct about what epistemic norms require, his conclusion would not show that we should actually suspend judgment about religious or anti-religious truth claims. | ||
| 601 | |a Episteme | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Shared evidence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Epistemic peers | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Evidentialism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Suspense of judgment | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Epistemic rationality | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Religious disagreements | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Feldman | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for philosophy of religion |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1970 |g 74(2013), 1, Seite 33-48 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320442098 |w (DE-600)2005049-5 |w (DE-576)103746927 |x 1572-8684 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:74 |g year:2013 |g number:1 |g pages:33-48 |
| 776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n elektronische Ausgabe |w (DE-627)1639670610 |k Electronic | ||
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/24709254 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-012-9366-1 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 74 |j 2013 |e 1 |h 33-48 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4208221631 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1821417623 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221110052729 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#F703DA42184A57EDA383B097D9CA18BCF766A9C1 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/24709254 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||