The deadlock of absolute divine simplicity

In this article, I explain how and why different attempts to defend absolute divine simplicity fail. A proponent of absolute divine simplicity has to explain why different attributions do not suppose a metaphysical complexity in God but just one superproperty, why there is no difference between God...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Schmitt, Yann (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2013
In: International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2013, Volume: 74, Issue: 1, Pages: 117-130
Further subjects:B Ontology
B Truthmaker
B Simplicity
B God
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1821417437
003 DE-627
005 20221110052729.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221110s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s11153-012-9336-7  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1821417437 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1821417437 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Schmitt, Yann  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The deadlock of absolute divine simplicity 
264 1 |c 2013 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In this article, I explain how and why different attempts to defend absolute divine simplicity fail. A proponent of absolute divine simplicity has to explain why different attributions do not suppose a metaphysical complexity in God but just one superproperty, why there is no difference between God and His super-property and finally how a absolute simple entity can be the truthmaker of different intrinsic predications. It does not necessarily lead to a rejection of divine simplicity but it shows that we may consider another conception of divine simplicity compatible with some metaphysical complexity in God. 
601 |a Absolution 
650 4 |a Ontology 
650 4 |a Truthmaker 
650 4 |a Simplicity 
650 4 |a God 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal for philosophy of religion  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1970  |g 74(2013), 1, Seite 117-130  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320442098  |w (DE-600)2005049-5  |w (DE-576)103746927  |x 1572-8684  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:74  |g year:2013  |g number:1  |g pages:117-130 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n elektronische Ausgabe  |w (DE-627)1639671188  |k Electronic 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/24709259  |x JSTOR 
856 |u https://zenodo.org/record/810247/files/DivinesimplicityIJPR.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH doi match)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-012-9336-7  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 74  |j 2013  |e 1  |h 117-130 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4208221445 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1821417437 
LOK |0 005 20221110052729 
LOK |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#773456FBCBB010AC50220AF405FF8679A2B76517 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/24709259 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL